The man who revealed some of Apple’s best-kept secrets now has to answer in federal court. Jon Prosserthe neatly-liked YouTuber of the channel Front Page Techis in the eye of the hurricane after the Cupertino company filed a formal lawsuit against it for leaking confidential information about iOS 26 before its official presentation. And if that weren’t enough, Prosser is expected to provide sworn statement before the courts on June 16a date that promises to be one of the most tense moments of this case.
The idea that ended up in court
It all started in early 2025, when Prosser published a series of videos on his channels showing what was supposed to be the new iOS 26 design, including the redesigned Camera app and the then-unknown visible language. “Liquid Glass”the most radical transformation of Apple’s interface in years. The problem wasn’t just publishing the videos. The problem was how he got that information.
According to the lawsuit filed in Northern District Court of CaliforniaApple accuses Prosser and his alleged accomplice, Michael Ramacciottiof orchestrating a coordinated scheme to illegally access an iPhone in development that belonged to Ethan Lipnikan Apple engineer. The accusation is quite specific and, let’s be honest, it sounds like a movie: Ramacciotti would have used geolocation tools to know when Lipnik was not at homeaccessed the apartment, decrypted the device’s code and then made a FaceTime video call with Prosser to show him the operating system’s secret interface.
Prosser, on the other end of that call, would have recorded the screenand with that self-discipline cloth he created the renders and models that he later presented publicly as “leaks.” Apple, which discovered all this thanks to a anonymous email from someone who recognized Lipnik’s apartment in the videoeven has a voice note in which Ramacciotti apologizes to Lipnik and points directly to Prosser as the intellectual responsible for the idea. Lipnik, by the way, was fired for not correctly following tool’s internal protection policies.
The formal accusations and what Apple asks
The demand does not remain in words. Apple formally accuses Prosser and Ramacciotti of misappropriation of trade secrets and to violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Law of the United States. Furthermore, the company alleges that the YouTuber benefited financially from all of this, generating advertising revenue on YouTube thanks to the movies that, according to Apple, relied on stolen self-discipline cloth.
What Apple is seeking in court is quite ambitious. The company wants a permanent court order that prevents Prosser from publishing any type of confidential information or trade secrets of the brand in the future, in addition to both he and Ramacciotti destroying or returning all self-discipline cloth that they still have in their possession. On top of that, Apple asks compensatory and punitive damagesreimbursement of legal fees and, to give more weight to the matter, requested that the case go to jury trial.
Prosser has not remained silent. On his social networks he responded quickly and firmly, ensuring that Apple’s version “does not reflect what happened on my side” and denying that he had conspired to access anyone’s phone. He also made it clear that he has evidence to support his version and that his report could be protected by the First Amendment of the American Constitution.
The deposition of June 16, the key moment
The case has had more twists than a suspense series. Following the lawsuit in July 2025, Prosser did not formally respond to the accusation within the fair deadline, causing October 2025 the court will apply a default judgmentthat is, an automatic resolution against you for not appearing. Apple won liability without Prosser being able to defend himself, but the case remained active to determine damages.
For months, the YouTuber only partially complied with subpoenas to deliver documents, according to reports from the court of April 2026. Apple even announced that it planned to file a motion in Ohio to force its cooperation. However, a major twist came on June 10, 2026: Apple and Prosser’s fair team jointly asked the court to vacate the default judgment, something Apple itself called “the most efficient way to move the case forward.”
The agreement is clear. Prosser agreed to turn over all outstanding documents and, as part of the discovery process, must give sworn statement on June 16, 2026provided that Judge Donato approves the motion. That deposition will be the moment when Apple will be able to ask him directly how much confidential information he really had in his possession, what he did with it and what his true role was in this entire scheme. Prosser’s responses that day will be decisive in establishing the amount of damages he may have to pay.
Jon Prosser’s case against Apple is not just a fight between a content creator and a multi-billion dollar corporation. It is a battle that is redefining the limits of technological journalism, the ethics of leaks and the real consequences of revealing secrets in the digital age. For better or worse, what happens in that courtroom in the coming days could mark a before and after in how the media and content creators cover big technology companies.
Keep reading:
• iPhone 17e: new leaks reveal its release date
• Leaking ensures that the iPhone 18 will incorporate a key change in its design
• The price of the iPhone 18 is leaked and there is good news for your pocket
