“The House of the Famous 6“has fallen into such contradictory themes, and it is not known if these come from the reflections of its hosts or if they are indications from the production. Today we will talk about the arguments presented at the gala on Sunday, May 17, where Javier Poza accused that the use of external themes and their forms are “unnecessary rudeness.”
Curvy Zelma and Josh Martínez were harshly exposed during said program for mentioning the name of Adrián di Monte, to ask for votes in favor of “Los Guerreros de la Luz”. The intention was clear: to destabilize Sandra Itzel with the mere mention of her ex-partner.
Now, Di Monte is a personality who has worked with Telemundo. He became the champion of the first season of “La Isla Desafío Extremo Türkiye”, a competition hosted by Javier Poza. That is to say, the Hispanic public knows who they are talking about, although not all of them have the context of his private life, when he was Itzel’s partner.
In the game of introducing information from outside, in the case concerning Itzel, Josh and Curvy, it was started by the new inhabitant during her first position. It was she who mentioned what Curvy did and did not do in relation to Alfredo Adame, when he was part of the current reality show “La Granja VIP” on TV Azteca. What relationship does that theme have with “La Casa de los Famosos 6”? None.
Curvy believed he had Adame’s support, while Adame, during part of Telemundo’s current affairs, was part of another digital project. The Mexican is not even aware of this. Because? Because it has nothing to do with the reality of the house.
Given what was described, Javier Poza described the situation as “unnecessary rudeness.” While Jimena Gállego affirms that at this stage of the competition, low blows are already allowed. That is, we are just weeks away from the great ideal.
Unfortunately, Poza’s words are a complete inconsistency on his part. Both he and Jimena Gállego have presented and at least apparently enjoyed “El Portal”, a dynamic that the production created for this season, in which they introduce topics external to current affairs to confront the inhabitants with their biggest detractors.
To date, four have been carried out: Celinee Santos, Curvy Zelma, Fabio Agostini and Yoridan Martínez They have gone through this dynamic. The first two have been the worst and have served to make the inhabitants of the land point the finger at Celinee Santos again and again.
So,The information from outside is valid when used against Celinee and Josh, but not when used against any inhabitant of the fourth earth and allies? Does this mean that production will not use this dynamic again, because, as its host says, it is “unnecessary rudeness”?
There is not a day in which the viewing public does not accuse the hosts of the program and its panelists of being biased. There is no cinema dynamic in which the production has not sought to directly and indirectly attack the inhabitants of the fourth water.
What is the intention behind this supposed “playing style” on the part of the production? Could it be that they only seek to enrage the public so that they become more entrenched in protecting the inhabitants of the fourth water? Ideally, there is no negative publicity, only confused followers? Is a game like this worth it? Is frustrating the public worth that much? The ranking seems to indicate the opposite!
Could it be that for now the withholding of damage does not matter because after the ideal of “La Casa de los Famosos 6”, Telemundo is the home of the Soccer World Cup?
Continue reading more about “La Casa de los Famosos 6” here:
This is how the voting goes in “La Casa de los Famosos 6”, today, May 15
Cristina Porta vs. Yina Calderón on the panel of “La Casa de los Famosos 6”; who is right?
Do they filter a list of upcoming eliminations from “La Casa de los Famosos 6” and would Verónica del Castillo come out on Monday, May 18?
