By Armando Hernandez
A federal appeals court has again ruled against President Donald Trump, rejecting a request to reconsider the lawsuit he filed against Hillary Clinton.the Democratic National Committee and several former federal officials for the alleged plot to link him to Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign.
The decision maintains in force both the dismissal of the case and the financial sanctions previously imposed against Trump and his then lawyer, Alina Habba, who were forced to pay close to a million dollars for filing what a judge described as a “frivolous” lawsuit promoted in bad faith.
The case was originally filed in 2022 in federal court in South Florida. Trump alleged that Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey and other figures linked to the Democratic Party participated in a conspiracy to discredit him through allegations of alleged ties between his campaign and Russia.
However, federal judge Donald Middlebrooks quickly dismissed the lawsuit, finding that the arguments lacked legal basis and that there were insufficient legal bases to proceed with the litigation.
JUST IN: 11th Cir. denies inquire from Trump/his attorneys, including Alina Habba, for en banc rehearing of option upholding $1 million sanction for filing frivolous lawsuit in opposition to Hillary Clinton, Comey & others. Doc: https://t.co/sGloNI5Zqq Previously: https://t.co/xTDjUMxuVJ
— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) Could maybe well per chance also unprejudiced 12, 2026
Judge accused political use of the courts
In a subsequent resolution issued in 2023, Middlebrooks went even further by financially sanctioning Trump and Habba. The magistrate stated that the then-former president used the judicial system as a tool of political retaliation.
Middlebrooks described Trump as “a prolific and sophisticated litigator” who constantly uses the courts to attack his political adversaries.. He also maintained that the president was the “architect of the strategic abuse of the judicial process.”
The fine imposed reached approximately one million dollars and was directed at both Trump and Habba’s legal firm, considering that the lawsuit should never have been filed.
The case later came before the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, where a panel of judges upheld the dismissal and upheld the sanctions.. In that ruling, issued in 2025, the justices concluded that several of the legal arguments raised by Trump were “effectively frivolous.”
During the hearings, some judges harshly questioned the Republican president’s team’s appropriate strategy and noted that the lawsuit attempted to construct a conspiracy theory without sufficient evidence.
The Supreme Court could be the next scenario
With the decision announced this Tuesday, the Eleventh Circuit rejected both the panel’s reconsideration and a full review of the case. According to the court order, no active judge on the court requested a vote to rehear the appeal.
The data drew attention because six of the court’s twelve active judges were appointed by Trump himself during his first presidential term.
The refusal leaves the options within that judicial instance practically exhausted, although the president could still try to take the case to the Supreme Court through a new appeal.
So far, the president’s top team has not publicly confirmed whether he will file an appeal to the Supreme Court.
The litigation was part of a series of legal actions promoted by Trump in recent years against political adversaries, media outlets and former officials linked to investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 elections..
Keep reading:
- “Trump should be impeached,” said Hillary Clinton during her appearance before Congress over the Epstein case
- Federal appeals court fines Donald Trump nearly a million dollars
- Special prosecutor accuses FBI of failures in Trump-Russia investigation, but ruled out a plot
